The Cult Message

Here is what I tried to teach Carly.

First, you must tackle hatred.

God feels no hatred. Hatred is the first of all sins, the sin of the Devil. His resentment at not being God. Like all hate, it's root is love. The Devil hates that which he can never be. God hates not the Devil, as God hates not the Damned.

God just feels indifferent to them. They have exhausted her Love. God does not hate.

When you hate, you feel an emotion God does not feel. You feel a thwarted love God does not know. Hatred is the emotion of losing and knowing you deserve to lose because you are wrong.

And the Devil asks us to join him sometimes by asking us to feel that emotion, sometimes, even when we're right. So we'll know how he feels.

But hatred is not love's opposite, it is what the Devil seeks as love's goal. The true opposite of love- is indifference.

Every second of hate we feel, is just missiles used by us on the love beyond the hate the love whose excess fuels that hate.

We can easily learn to stop hating.

By learning to redirect. By turning away from the fight against ourselves. Stop hating black people, instead maybe love the white people a bit more who you hate black people so much because out of your supposed love of white people that white people don't see. Stop hating gay people, maybe love the ladies a bit more?

No one hates unless they love. Messed up as that is, hatred is the sign of a loving heart. Juswt one that is bound to the Devil. Because to repent hatred, you have to stop feeling it. And trust me, die hating a single thing in this universe, you die Damned.

By hating, you curse yourself.

Second, you must tackle anger.

There's little point in it. Exhibiting it can never lead anywhere. It has purpose on a battlefield, perhaps, but we're not on a battlefield. Therefore, it's dangerous.

It's a classic example, of course, of where women get away with being quite nasty to men. There's a moral loophole they get away with exploiting. Winding men up to a point where in the wild a man would have lashed out. But men are supposed to be like the proverbial guards at Buckingham Palace. I don't want to see women hit, of course I don't. But I don't want to see men hit either.

And I've heard many examples of women hitting men and people saying 'Oh he deserved it. He wound her up'.

The fact is- anger is a no-no. We live in a society where we have police officers and we have courts of law. It is their function to deal with disputes. But otherwise, we have to get on. Therefore we CANNOT under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES display anger.

Third, of course, is jealousy. That's easy enough. The easiest of all to over-ride.

But, in a nutshell, it's actually quite easy really. You just need to understand the principles. Your own emotions are not actually real, they're merely subjective. You can go in behind the workings and once you understand the wiring, you can simply start overwriting the programming. Introduce balancing systems so that you can use one emotion to drown out another.

The simplest systems to learn involve simple responses to stimuli. If you always have several thought processes going on in your head, you can easily 'turn one up' so as to drown out external stimuli. Avoid hearing what you think might upset you. Learn what to respond to and what not to.

You need to start thinking from a wider perspective. The emotion you actually feel doesn't matter. It' the emotion demanded of you by circumstances that matters. So- you need to learn to act.

Like any method acting, you get the emotions from within yourself. So it's not a question of repressing your emotions; you still need them. But they need to be your servants, not your masters. Your emotions are to be what others WISH them to be. You can display compassion, because you know compassion- and usually you will be displaying it at the right time, so that needn't worry you.

but nobody likes to be disliked, so you're not allowed to dislike people. But you know what liking someone is like so you can use that emotion to act believably. Basically- you force yourself to FEEL 'like'. That's the way method acting works. Emotionally, you get into the part you're playing.

Which is; likes everybody. Never raise their voice. Feels no anger, hatred or jealousy.

It's simple method acting. Eventually, you won't know the difference yourself. The difference between the act and reality disappears. You'll have PROGRAMMED yourself to be perpetually NICE. But it won't be robotic. Because you're using emotions you feel sometimes and understand. You're just programming yourself to exhibit the NICE emotions regardless.

Fake? Well, not really because that suggests that there is something real which this mimicks. This is not the case. It's simply that now your emotions are somewhat articial, always. There is no longer ANY natural emotion.

There can't be. Because you're not any longer spontaneous. Every emotion you feel gets sent up to the cental processor to be evaluated to see if it's suitable to display. So even what you REALLY feel has been sculpted and amended.

So nothing you say is ever SINCERE, it's all CALCULATED. What it is, is polite.

So the emotions are real enough, they're just now strategically produced, moderated, fitted to the environment. They are what the environment wants.

So- how does this effect 'love'?




Well, the point of all this is to be harmonious. Put bluntly, it means that it doesn't matter who you FEEL you love, you have to treat all people equally. You will love those who WANT you to love them and you will do so if this co-incides with the consensus view of others. It doesn't really matter what you genuinely feel on this topic, except insofar as someone has to make the first move.

Since this is women's role- to select men, it's essentially the function of men to give them what they want. To ask whether you love a woman is to overstep your function in all this. It's whether you make her feel good that matters.

The way to see it is quite simple. Imagine it's your job. Imagine you are paid to prostitute yourself emotionally and physically to women. What are you being paid in?

Sex. Pats on the head. Cuddles. Love. You'll feel good. You will feel love for her, if you get it right. Because she'll pet you and pamper you back.

So really, it's a simple proposition. Don't get confused by 'falling in love', that doesn't work. Over ride that and think what you're doing. Think what you want and what you have to do to get it. Be PROFESSIONAL about it.

And this isn't done by displaying your feelings. After all, no point giving your pearls to swine. No point in 'being in love' with someone who doesn't love you back. And as for whether they ACTUALLY love you, well, you can only judge by actions. After all, you don't REALLY care WHY they're patting your head, you don't care if their feelings are 'fake' or not.

And that- frankly- is how you make 'love' work. You need to start seeing the other person is actually paying you in sex, in caresses, in pats on the head,m in cuddles, in nice words- which could be 'real' or 'fake' you don't care either way- for YOUR successful performance in making THEM feel loved.

The whole thing is an act. In a sense. In that for it to really hit the spot for both of you, both of you need to use ART and SKILL. Not spontaneity. The whole thing is contrived from start to finish. You're not showing 'genuine feelings', you're doing better.

What you give her is what she'd get if she was paying you five hundred pounds a night to make her FEEL loved. And what you expect back- in lieu of that five hundred pounds your acting performance justifies- is an equal performance BACK from her. You want HER to make YOU feel as if YOU'D paid five hundred pounds for her to make YOU feel loved.

For it to work it HAS to be slightly contrived. It has to be choreographed, linguistically 'touched up'. But does that make it fake?

No. Just because the dancer has become so good that it can no longer be told where dance ends and dancer begins doesn't make it less real. Just that we're programming the environment to get the emotions and hence we can control their production. Because of this- they no longer truly matter. We no longer do things because we feel emotions, we feel emotions because we do things.

Emotions cease to be causes of things, only the effects of things. Products, not components.

Purity.

There is an important point Carly failed to grasp.

To achieve this level of detachment takes real concentration but also strategic thinking. For example- can you remember what you 'know' and don't know?

This is a simple point of mine. I only know what you tell me. I don't 'know' what other people have said to me about you. Because you don't, presumably, want me to. If you did, you'd tell me. So I only 'know' your version of events. Even when I know your version can't be right. It is still- when talking to you- the only version I know.

It's about avoiding conflict. And that is done by trying as far as possible to have no independent subjective thoughts of your own. Objectives ones, yes. You can make a decision on voting, for example.

But if something involves a decision made on emotion, don't bother. Just go with the majority and force yourself to like it. You need, as I say, to know who you're voting for. You actually have to put a cross in a box. But you don't NEED to make a choice ever on things like 'being in love' or 'wanting to spend your life with someone'. Just follow the path of least resistance.

Right, ok. So how does this affect 'being in love'?

Look, if you've got this far, you're pretty much in control of your emotions. You can only feel what you choose to feel. That's the point.

As I say, to ask at this point what your emotions ever REALLY are is slightly pointless, because they never impact on the outward appearances. You have complete control to DEPLOY what emotions you CHOOSE to deploy when you choose to deploy them.

What to others is one process, is to you, two separated processes. In one process, you receive emotions. But you then register them- save the experience in your databanks so as you can empathise with others when you can SEE that's what THEY are feeling. You 'downlaod the app', if you like, to use as a tool.

Then, you release an equal and opposite reaction, a COUNTER emotion, if you like.

And that's where you get your buzz. In drowing anger with mercy. Because you then you get to feel just and merciful. In drowing jealousy with generous submissiveness. Because then you get to feel selfless and forgiving. In drowning hatred with tolerance. Because then you get to feel all loving and wise.

And yes, oh goddam yes.

In drowning 'being in love' with self-denial of it. In rejecting it.

Self denial in all such things creates a more profound emotion; the emotion of self denial. And feeling it grip you, like a cold, icy breeze- it ennervates. You have total power over yourself. You are unbreakable. Free. You are ABOVE emotions, you are the OVERMAN.

Because that, you see, is what sorts out the men from the boys. When you truly can switch your emotions on and off like a tap, then you have become the future. You are the successor to man, no longer man. Beyond human.

You are the Overman of Nietzsche.

So- heartbreak in love is the adolescence you must go through. You must learn to triumph over the heartbreak and YOURSELF gain control of that response system. And the way you do that is by keeping deliberately falling in love and setting the heartbreak up yourself until one day, you and you alone control whether or not you feel that emotion. No one else can touch the supply. You can't feel heartbreak- you just switch the emotion off.

And when you can do that, you can switch them all off. Anger. Hatred. Jealousy. Political incorrectness. Using the 'C' word. The lot.

And if we can all do that, then it's my guess no one will ever even shout at anyone, let alone hit them. People just won't ever FEEL like it.

We'll only ever feel what we feel like feeling :)

Because if you can choose what to feel all the time- then why not choose to always be NICE and behave as if you really did- emotionally- love EVERYONE?

I wanted to teach Carly that, but sadly, she just wasn't a very good pupil.

So I stopped wasting my time on her.

That's really all there ever was to it. She didn't want to learn how to rise above her own emotions and achieve a TRUE strength- as opposed to the fake blusterings of someone weak where it matters.

Denial of one's own emotions, triumphing over them, standing cold, hard and firm when a whirlpool of defeated emotion swirls around inside you, that sense of utter calm, total peace, it's the calm to be found in the eye of the storm.

You are the Overman. The master, not the servant of your feelings.

And such a step puts you as far above a human being who cannot control their feelings, as Man is above the Chimpanzee.

What I sought to teach Carly was how HIGHER beings love. She was too much of a beast to learn.




And Hartley?

Read his blog. See how he thinks. He isn't interested in people becoming enlightened.

Hartley was never interested in defending women- I have never once seen him come to aid a women in need of aid.

He came to the aid of Carly, because beasts aid beasts. Because there are some who choose to live and love like beasts and they don't like being confronted with true ethics.

What I have written here is a blueprint to show each and every one of you to live and love like decent people.

Hartley sympathised with Carly Swan because she is a beast. That's all there is to it. It really ISN'T more complicated than that. He admires her bestiality and wants bestiality like hers preserved.

Anyway, before I go, I thought I'd leave a discussion point for next time.

Because I thought I'd start the next post with a bang and, in moving on from the past, present to you my REAL views on love.

Ok- think about this point and discuss;

Is not Sado-Masochism the ultimate expression of the struggle between Good and Evil? Is not Love inevitably proved through Masochist pleasure IN pain?